Misinformation About the Act of 1871 is an Ongoing Problem – Part 1
I am, therefore, publishing this information – again – for those of you who are still vulnerable to believing a bunch of hucksters bent on saving their own hides.
Facebook Friends will have to go to my website www.annavonreitz.com to get copies of the documents.
Many thanks to Team Law which is quoted in Part 3 and which took the time to unravel the considerable tangled up history of „the Act of 1871“ which was repealed in 1874–- and where it went from there.
Many thanks also to Frank O’Collins who rooted through the public records and published them and to the indefatigable „Informer“ whose life’s work was to uncover The Great Fraud.
First, however, we begin with an instructive quote from Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, published in 1856, which explains in no uncertain terms the fact that a „United States of America“ corporation existed prior to the Civil War, and exposes the incipient „similar names deceit“ made possible by using the name of a country as the name of a private corporation:
Quoting from „A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States“ by John Bouvier. Published 1856:
(1) Definition of United States of America: “The name of this country. The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California. “
(5) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property. 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181.
But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.“ – end quote.
This tell us that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a Municipal Corporation chartered by the Municipal United States Government dba „the“ United States, and that this corporation can’t sue its parent corporation without „authority of law“ – meaning that the Municipal Government has to create specific laws allowing its franchise corporation dba the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to sue it. Without that, there is no remedy for any wrong practiced by „the“ United States – the Municipal United States Government – against the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA– incorporated.
Please notice the „legal style“ convention. The name of this country is simply scribed in upper and lower case: United States of America. And though it is not mentioned in Bouvier’s, our Federation of States is also simply scribed in upper and lower case except that the definite article is added and made part of the name: The United States of America.
By creating commercial corporations, that is, Municipal Corporations, „in the name of“ entire countries, the Municipal United States Government has promoted confusion and fraud which has allowed it to „latch onto“ the credit owed to entire countries.
Thus, China is not CHINA and Great Britain is not „the“ UK.
These entities appearing in all capital letters are in fact foreign Municipal Corporations with respect to the countries they are named after.
It all started in the 1840’s when the banks began this process of mirroring actual nations with corporations named after entire countries. This is a first step necessary to subject the victims of identity theft via assumption to foreign law; once thus „subscribed“ and enclosed – in this case, „incorporated“ – the victims have no recourse to sue the „parent corporation“.
You can see this same principal at work today. Your local Burger King franchise, for example, has no ability to sue its parent corporations at the national or international levels.
Via these loopholes and deceits, the Municipal Government set itself up in a rather impregnable position with respect to its own fraud scheme. If and when CHINA was mistaken for China, for example, China would become liable for CHINA’s debts. And if CHINA, INC. was subsequently blamed for this, it would have no recourse to sue „the“ United States – that is, the Municipal United States Government allowed to exist under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.
And neither could the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ever sue „the“ United States nor the parent corporation it set up for itself, „the“ UNITED STATES, nor the Municipal Umbrella Corporation standing as a parent to „the“ UNITED STATES– the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.
The Perpetrators spared no effort to render their victims paralyzed and without remedy, and equally spared no effort to protect themselves with layers upon layers of parent corporations which could never be sued either by the victims or by the „slave“ corporations they created as franchises for themselves.
Only one law pertains to them, The Perpetrators, that can be used against them – Roman Civil Law.
Ironically, while the Roman Civil Law allows deceit and will not punish deceivers so long as their victims remain deceived as a Maxim of Law –- „Let him who will be deceived, be deceived.“ – when fraud is discovered and objected to, another Maxim of Law kicks into gear–- „Fraud vitiates everything it touches.“
We discovered the fraud and invoked their own law against them and had standing to do so.
You can begin to see the vastness of the worldwide fraud that went on here and the enslavement and racketeering that resulted in virtually every country on Earth.
Friday, January 15, 2021
Misinformation About the Act of 1871 is an Ongoing Problem – Part 2
By Anna Von Reitz
We dealt with the Prelude understanding of the Big Picture and Nomenclature and Credits to other Researchers in Part 1. In Part 2, we discover other important aspects….
There is nothing called „The Act of 1871“ is the first bit of pure gold. The fecund and feral 41st Congress of „the“ United States of America chunked out dozens of „Acts“ in 1871 and it is open to question which Act is purportedly „the“ Act.
The second piece of critical need-to-know mission information is that you will never understand any Act of 1871, no matter which one you pick, without first grasping the importance of what I call „the“ Act of 1870 – the prior year’s mischief promoted by the Rump Congress.
The Act of 1870 is in its way far more interesting and deplorable, as the Vermin gave themselves rights that they don’t actually possess – and that is, to charter corporations „for“ the District of Columbia, which is not now and never was a sovereign nation or State of the Union.
The Act of 1870 was blatant usurpation executed under the False Presumption of the „absence“ of our States and our Federation of States and sought to make the District of Columbia a separate Commonwealth (British) entity with the powers of a sovereign nation – which it is not then, nor now.
The ability to form corporations and to incorporate them for the benefit of a sovereign entity is a uniquely sovereign activity that has never extended to the Territorial Government of the District of Columbia by these United States and which was never allowed to the British Monarch under The Constitution of the United States of America.
So right there, in public, is a fundamental Breach of Trust and the action, along with so many others, is rendered void both for fraud and for violation of The Constitution of the United States of America, because it seeks to redefine the nature and character of the Territorial Government and make it a sovereign government and imbue it with „Powers“ never delegated to it.
The verminous import of „the“ Act of 1871 is only made possible by the earlier usurpation and Breach of Trust embodied in the referenced Act of 1870. The ability to form corporations „for“ the District of Columbia self-evidently had to come before the effort to create Municipal Corporations „for“ the District of Columbia – which is another, separate, and never allowed „Power“ of incorporation.
Virtually everything that the Congresses from 1865 to 1888 accomplished, is illegal, unlawful, immoral, deceptive, and forbidden under one form of law or another, and they simply played „Dodge Ball“ trying to evade the consequences of their actions by trading hats – acting first as „the“ Congress of „the“ United States Municipal Government, and next acting as „the“ Congress of „the“ United States of America Territorial Government.
No doubt it was a heady prospect to usurp upon the States and People, who trustingly slept on for another hundred and fifty years, none the wiser.
And yet today, it is apparent that all that they „accomplished“ was done under conditions of Breach of Trust, violation of commercial contract, and fraud. It’s all null and void under Roman Civil Law and under International Law as well.
It leaves both the Municipal United States Government and the Territorial United States Government guilty of Gross Breach of Trust, Usurpation, and Fraud.
And we are still talking about „the“ Act of 1870 and the creation of the power to form corporations for the District of Columbia.
The next Act in 1871 presumes upon the first Act in 1870 to access a further power, that of incorporation.
Basically, our Subcontractors have been exercising powers of our sovereign governments that were never granted to them. And now, the infamy of what these men did in the shadow of the Civil War is coming home to roost. Unfortunately, once the infection of corruption set in, it spread worldwide.
When you step back and view both the Corporations Act of 1870 and the Act to Form a Government for the District of Columbia in 1871, it becomes crystal clear that the object of all this was to make a Municipal Corporation the Government of the District of Columbia, and to usurp the Territorial Government that was already responsible for the District of Columbia’s governance, and to substitute a Municipal Governor for the Territorial Governor.
This made it a Double Coup d’Etat, one by secretive fraud and usurpation against the lawful American Government and our Federation of States, and second, against the British Territorial United States via legal manipulations and chicanery designed to substitute a Municipal Corporation for the Territorial Government.
Overall, it’s what you would expect from the scheming Papists, if you realize that all of this was predicated on the ownership of two corporations by the Pope, both the Territorial Municipal Corporation dba UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the Municipal Corporation dba UNITED STATES. Of course, the Pope would own the Commonwealth entity as well as the Municipal entity, and he would want the Commonwealth corporation to be explicitly subservient to the parent Municipal corporation, in order to better control everything. And that’s what the scheming rats did.
Misinformation About the Act of 1871 is an Ongoing Problem – Part 3
upshot of it was to ensconce a Municipal for-profit Corporation as the Government of the District of Columbia, be prepared for more (unpleasant) surprises.
Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia …. 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28,1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).
by both guilty parties – the Queen’s Commonwealth Government, also known as the Territorial Government, which the Queen operates as an Overseer for the Pope, and the Pope’s own Municipal Government, set up as a corporation in the Territorial District of Columbia.
solely for the purpose of making profit for their private shareholders –- the banks and people like Nancy Pelosi, who squandered and rolled in the profits of these criminal enterprises, while talking –loudly– about protecting the Constitutions they evaded and tried their best to destroy.
all the assets of the Municipal Corporations, in fact belong to us, the American States and People, whose delegated power was abused and whose sovereign power was usurped in order to create these Municipal Corporations, including the Municipality of the District of Columbia and the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, and all the franchises and derivatives that have been „spun off“ ever since.
corporations pretending to be your government.
Posse Comitatus, State Assemblies, and Our Military Operations
The U.S. Military is still employed by us and staffed by our sons and daughters, albeit directed by middlemen, and their duty and contract is very clearly stipulated. If they want to keep their jobs, they have to protect us and our civilian government, which is no longer being „represented“ by the Municipal United States, now that we are presenting ourselves and operating our own State
It’s all very good news for America and the world at large.